We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.
Environment

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

What is the Difference Between a Mountain and a Hill?

Tricia Christensen
By
Updated: Jun 04, 2024
Views: 107,541
Share

The differences between a mountain and a hill are difficult and nebulous. There isn’t a standard definition that sharply delineates one from the other. Even the United States Geological Survey (USGS) concludes that these terms don’t have technical definitions and no scientific consensus exists to determine if a person is looking at, standing on, or merely regarding a mountain or a hill.

In the UK, there used to be a standard method for defining a mountain and a hill. This was based on height, and for a while the US adopted this standard too. Both countries defined a mountain as being 1,000 feet (304.8 m) or more tall. Any similar landform lower than this height was considered a hill.

The US attempted to not just measure by height, but suggest that there had to be a drop of 1,000 feet or an 1,000 foot relief in order for a mountain to be considered such. These definitions were discarded in the 1920s, leaving us with no clear distinction between a mountain and a hill. It’s as vague as possible, though most people would agree that exceptionally tall mountains are indeed not hills. For instance, a person probably wouldn’t think of defining Mt. Everest as anything but a mountain, and certainly wouldn’t expect it to be considered a hill.

Most people would agree that significantly high areas with large drops are mountains, particularly when their names are preceded by the term Mount. Hills are more vague and are those softer, more easily climbed, areas of rising ground. Climbing a mountain to its peak or summit is called summiting, but people will rarely hear others discuss how they summited a local hill, unless they are in jest. Sometimes the difference is that mountains are named while hills may not be. Instead of relying on heights or drops, the definition in this way depends on local agreement that something is a mountain and deserves a name.

There is a film that references the old UK definition of the difference between a mountain and a hill. The film is The Englishman Who Went up a Hill But Came down a Mountain, made in 1995. The movie is actually based on real events in Wales, though the names have been changed. The basic events concern a certain town’s claim to the first mountain in Wales, named Ffynnon Garw. When a surveyor, played by Hugh Grant, comes to measure the “mountain,” he finds it short by about 16 feet (4.87 m) and declares to the town that they don’t have a mountain. The Welsh villagers respond by adding 16 feet of dirt, rocks, and various other things so they can keep their pride and the title of mountain.

Share
All Things Nature is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Tricia Christensen
By Tricia Christensen
With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a All Things Nature contributor, Tricia Christensen is based in Northern California and brings a wealth of knowledge and passion to her writing. Her wide-ranging interests include reading, writing, medicine, art, film, history, politics, ethics, and religion, all of which she incorporates into her informative articles. Tricia is currently working on her first novel.
Discussion Comments
By anon948813 — On May 02, 2014

I think there are two important factors in the hill/mountain comparison.

1. Height. The summit of the mountain must be significantly higher than the baseline elevation of the area. The baseline is related to the bottom of the valleys and plains surrounding the mountain

The height requirement is proportional to the slope. Perhaps a minimum height of 500 feet regardless of the slope.

2. Slope. The elevation must rise at a certain rate so as to have an average slope that can not be walked. You might have 1 or more faces that can be walked to reach the summit, but generally you must climb a mountain.

By anon320613 — On Feb 18, 2013

There are areas in the great plains that are over 5,000 feet in elevation and when you're there, it feels like you're in Florida because it is flat.

By anon160615 — On Mar 16, 2011

I support the criterion of height as to the distinction between a hill and a mountain. I found a difference in their physiques. Pardon my mistake if I make any, however, I think that the mountains are more rocky than the hills and very difficult to climb up and the latter ones are more soily than the former ones. That's the reason why we have frequent environmental problem in the form of 'Landslide' in hilly regions.

Look at the Mount Everest: it's hard and so rough in its appearance. On the contrary, hills are more grassy and soft looking. The hill of Swifts Creek at Victoria represents so. Above all, it's my personal opinion.

By ddljohn — On Mar 14, 2011

Another way to distinguish between mountains and hills is to look out for any other hill or mountain ranges nearby. Mountains don't usually stand by themselves, but rather are a part of a range of mountains.

Do you remember middle school and high school science courses? They had taught us that mountains form when two tectonic plates collide and fold over forming mountains. Just look at some of the most famous mountain ranges, like Mt. Everest. They cover huge areas of land. The chances of having just one mountain surrounded by low level land is just unlikely. If it's the case, it's probably a hill, not a mountain.

By candyquilt — On Mar 12, 2011

@fify--That sounds about right because Cavanal Hill, the highest hill in the world that is located in Oklahoma, is 1999 feet. It would probably be considered a mountain if it was just one feet taller. After the 1920s, geographers might have come to a consensus that 2000 feet is a better distinction between a hill and mountain rather than just 1000 feet.

I'm not too sure about a summit. But as far as I know, a summit is just the highest point. So a hill should have a summit just as a mountain does.

By fify — On Mar 09, 2011

In geography class, we learned that if it is 2000 feet and higher, it is a mountain. If it is less than 2000 feet, it is a hill. Is this incorrect? My teacher also said that mountains have summits whereas, hills do not.

Tricia Christensen
Tricia Christensen
With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a All Things Nature contributor, Tricia...
Learn more
Share
https://www.allthingsnature.org/what-is-the-difference-between-a-mountain-and-a-hill.htm
Copy this link
All Things Nature, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

All Things Nature, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.